Viewpoint on Dover Intelligent Design Opinion

Jonathan Witt

Viewpoint has a thoughtful, five-part series on Judge John Jones and his opinion in the Dover intelligent design trial:

It is our opinion that the judge was correct in finding that the defendents were motivated by their religious beliefs and that he was correct to find fault with the consistency of their testimony. He was therefore constrained by Supreme Court precedent to find in favor of the plaintiffs. Nevertheless, much of his reasoning seems to us to be flawed and his decision is much broader than is warranted by his written opinion.

The full analysis is here.