Science is on the move. It is slowly morphing from observing nature to embodying naturalism.
“It’s quite plausible” is treated as equivalent to evidence, eliding the question of how exactly we come to “consciously believe” anything.
They could just as well say that whatever created horses created unicorns, too.
Cosmologists sense the problem and strive to rescue their multiverse from the nagging demands for evidence.
Science writer Dennis Overbye calls the inflation controversy a crisis in cosmology. But maybe it is more of a crossroads.
String theory, which took root in the 1970s, proposes that “all objects in our universe are composed of vibrating filaments (strings) and membranes (branes) of energy.”
Cosmology has become an art form. Stylish essays are decked out with a very brief skirt of science.
Fine-tuning of the universe is so unpleasant a subject for materialists that it cannot really become a controversy.
Typing “Big Bang Theory” into a search bar links us immediately to a long-running (debut 2007), immensely popular CBS sitcom.
The prevalence of, for example, fake physics, shows that we are in the midst of a philosophical decline.