His choice of targets for criticism and for praise have a lot more to do with his particular agenda than the defects or merits of those whom he critiques.
There are innumerable descriptions and definitions of theistic evolution. How things are phrased matters a lot.
He defines himself as a Christian who affirms evolution, while also rejecting the name theistic evolutionist.
A participant did not like that I called his origins model “idiosyncratic,” or that I characterized the reaction to it as “cautious.” Oh well.
I asked fairly innocuous questions, realizing that I was being allowed to participate as long as I didn’t cause strife.