Would it, in fact, be enlightening if you were to sit a Darwinist and a Darwin skeptic together for an extended period of time to talk and see what really lies at the bottom of their disagreement?
If the history of the United States is an illustration of intelligent design at work in worldly affairs, what’s the purpose behind the design?
Darwinian evolution and intelligent design are competing theories of biological origins, but they are more than that.
He doesn’t mean there won’t be humans in the Oval Office in the future, but that the power behind the power will be AI. Is it true?
Darwin himself could take refuge in an “Evolution of the Gaps” scenario where confirmation of his theory would emerge with time. Modern Darwinists don’t have that luxury.