It’s pretty remarkable to see these ideas connected so explicitly.
Genuine scientific debate on fundamental issues that real people care about is such a rarity that when it happens, you almost want to pinch yourself to make sure you’re not dreaming.
On Dennis Venema’s argument, along comes a second geneticist, no friend to biology that’s open to the design hypothesis.
Whether the context is Wikipedia or the academic scene on the Iberian Peninsula, the scientific “consensus” on ID is maintained by shutting down debate and silencing scholarship.
The point here, I think, is about standards that are unevenly applied. Is that evidence of axe-grinding? You decide.