Naturalism (the view that it’s material nature all the way down) hasn’t fared much better with human language than with consciousness.
What if the answers to some scientific questions were correct but defined as outside the bounds of science?
Actually, it is somewhat unusual during the reign of naturalism for so much dissent to come from within the discipline, as it has in neuroscience.
While Darwin may have doubted the fully naturalized mind and felt horrid, most latter-day supporters believe and feel good.
There is no reason, based on current "human evolution" claims, to abandon a typical traditional religious or philosophical teaching on the origin, honor, or dignity of human beings.