Our responses to the Muller two-step have been around for a long time; it would be nice if ID critics would recognize and perhaps answer them.
Since 2007, Hunt has been claiming to have refuted Michael Behe’s thesis that irreducible complexity cannot arise by mindless evolutionary processes.
Explaining this sort of phenomenon by slight, successive modification, as Darwin envisaged, seems problematic.
Histones are responsible for organizing and packaging the DNA of a cell nucleus into structural units known as nucleosomes.
All of this calls to mind a comment from biologist John Mattick, a critic of the junk DNA paradigm.