Author: Jonathan Wells
Ask an Embryologist: Genomic Mosaicism
It’s the organism controlling the DNA, not the DNA controlling the organism.
All in All, Not a Great Day for neo-Darwinism
The major finding in the Nature article to which Casey Luskin referred earlier is, if anything, evidence AGAINST neo-Darwinian evolution.
For Overcoming Students’ Intuitions of Design, The American Biology Teacher Suggests Employing Evo-Devo
I just finished reading an article by Kostas Kampourakis and Alessandro Minelli, “Evolution Makes More Sense in the Light of Development.”
Revolutionary Biology
We are in the midst of a revolution in the way we conceive of living things.
Biology’s Quiet Revolution
Huge unanswered questions remain, and they will only be answered by going beyond the discredited myth that “DNA makes RNA makes protein makes us.”
Junk DNA: Darwinists Say They Are "Largely Free from Assumptions or Hypotheses"
Oxford University researchers say that only 8.2% of our DNA is likely to be functional. The rest is “junk.”
Paul Nelson at the Society for Developmental Biology
The title of Paul’s poster was "The Target Problem in Characterizing Early Metazoan Developmental Sequences."
Flailing Blindly: The Pseudoscience of Josh Rosenau and Carl Zimmer
I did not watch the sixth episode of Cosmos on April 13, but I’m told that it included animations to illustrate the molecular workings of a chloroplast.
"In China We Can Criticize Darwin": The 1999 China Conference
In June 1999, Paul Nelson and I flew to Kunming in southern China to attend an International Symposium on The Origins of Animal Body Plans and Their Fossil Record.
"In China We Can Criticize Darwin": Prelude
In February 1999, I had arranged for a talk at the University of Washington for Jun-Yuan Chen, a Chinese paleontologist who was an acknowledged expert on the Cambrian explosion.