It’s the organism controlling the DNA, not the DNA controlling the organism.
The major finding in the Nature article to which Casey Luskin referred earlier is, if anything, evidence AGAINST neo-Darwinian evolution.
I just finished reading an article by Kostas Kampourakis and Alessandro Minelli, “Evolution Makes More Sense in the Light of Development.”
We are in the midst of a revolution in the way we conceive of living things.
Huge unanswered questions remain, and they will only be answered by going beyond the discredited myth that “DNA makes RNA makes protein makes us.”
Oxford University researchers say that only 8.2% of our DNA is likely to be functional. The rest is “junk.”
The title of Paul’s poster was "The Target Problem in Characterizing Early Metazoan Developmental Sequences."
I did not watch the sixth episode of Cosmos on April 13, but I’m told that it included animations to illustrate the molecular workings of a chloroplast.
In June 1999, Paul Nelson and I flew to Kunming in southern China to attend an International Symposium on The Origins of Animal Body Plans and Their Fossil Record.
In February 1999, I had arranged for a talk at the University of Washington for Jun-Yuan Chen, a Chinese paleontologist who was an acknowledged expert on the Cambrian explosion.