To me, this kind of back and forth is more amenable to serious discussion and reflection than quick volleys on a discussion board.
I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope.
Dr. King was sharply critical of the misuse of science to promote racial discrimination, and he spoke forcefully against the idea that humans are the products of a blind material process.
Zelinski’s articles portray the science standards battle as a struggle to introduce creationism or intelligent design into Texas’s science curriculum.
At some point, you’d think reporters would be embarrassed about this sort of “zombie journalism.”