Author: Michael Behe
Coyne and Polar Bears: Why You Should Never Rely on Incompetent Reviewers
A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes.
Woo-hoo! In Science Review of Darwin Devolves, Lenski Has No Response to My Main Argument
In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front.
Here’s How to Tell if Scientists Are Exaggerating
Here’s the simple test to tell if scientists are exaggerating wildly. Let’s call it: “The Principle of Comparative Difficulty.”
On Intelligent Design, Do Your Own Homework. Make Up Your Own Mind.
C.S. Lewis encountered an objection to his literary criticism analogous to Kevin Williamson’s and explored its underlying logic.
Best of Behe: Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design? An Address at the American Museum of Natural History
Let’s begin with a sketch of the design argument.