Author: Stephen C. Meyer
Denying the Signature: Of Minds and Causes
Bishop and O’Connor claim that in Darwin’s Doubt, my “analysis assumes that… mind is fundamentally immaterial.”
Denying the Signature: Methodological Naturalism and Materialism-of-the Gaps
O’Connor and Bishop offer no evolutionary mechanism as an explanation for the origin of the information necessary to produce novel forms of life.
Denying the Signature: Was My Argument Subjective?
Bishop and O’Connor claim there is no objective, scientific basis for privileging, or focusing on, “life” in my analysis.
Denying the Signature: Functional Information Is the Fact to Be Explained
Philosophers of science analyzing scientific arguments make a clear distinction between what needs to be explained and the competing explanations.
Denying the Signature: A Response to Bishop and O’Connor
Philosophers Robert Bishop and Robert O’Connor offer a cleverly titled joint review of Darwin’s Doubt and Signature in the Cell.