Author: Stephen C. Meyer
Happy New Year! Here Is #1 of Our Top-Ten Evolution Stories of 2013: Responding to Charles Marshall’s Review of Darwin’s Doubt
Such constructive, respectful debate, in multiple media, was extremely encouraging.
Does Lightning-Fast Evolution Solve the Cambrian Enigma?
The authors of a paper in Current Biology present the problem of the Cambrian explosion — the rapid emergence of new forms of animal life — as it own solution.
More on Small Shelly Fossils and the Length of the Cambrian Explosion: A Concluding Response to Charles Marshall
In my previous replies to Marshall’s review in Science of Darwin’s Doubt, I’ve responded to his critiques of the main argument of the book.
Does Darwin’s Doubt Commit the God-of-the-Gaps Fallacy?
According to Charles Marshall, I argue “that paleontologists are unable to explain the Cambrian explosion, thus opening the door to the possibility of a designer’s intervention.”
To Build New Animals, No New Genetic Information Needed? More in Reply in Charles Marshall
To rebut the central argument of Darwin’s Doubt, Marshall must deny (or push from view) what we know about what new forms of animal life require as a condition of their existence.
