Some lessons drawn from debating Darwinists in general, and Ken Miller in particular.
Readers who expect a sharp clash of swords will be disappointed. In fact, some might wonder what disagreement, if any, exists between us.
Has Shapiro really solved anything? His “third way” seems more like an equivocation strategy.
Shapiro is as dismissive of Darwinism as any ID proponent. On the other, he constantly gives public notice that he is not on the side of ID.
In a recent news story, Alexandra Witze writes, “Although intelligent design is not scientific …” That’s highly misleading. In a supposedly fair and accurate news story about this growing controversy, Witze presents as fact a key point of contention in the debate.