If this is the best Darwnists can do with Nagel, they and their theory are in sad shape.
The defection from Darwinism of atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel, joined with his respectful evaluation of arguments for intelligent design, was huge news this year.
Nagel offers no concrete proposal of what a teleological process capable of originating biological complexity might look like.
About a decade ago I would muse on what it might take for intelligent design to win the day.
On a bright December day in 1994 in Green Valley, Arizona, the term “design inference” hit me.