Seldom have I seen a piece of scientifically inspired writing like Felsenstein’s that is so far off the mark.
A common objection to neo-Darwinian evolution highlights the fact that the theory is based to a large extent on chance events, or chance in general.
Stephen Meyer and Richard Dawkins have been engaged in a disagreement. How shall we adjudicate it?
As a geneticist, I have been “preaching” exactly this non-Darwinian kind of evolution and speciation since 1986.