Is Richard Dawkins a Coward?

That’s what a fellow atheist is now suggesting because Dawkins is refusing to debate one of his most articulate critics, philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig.

Contradictions, Irony, and Appeals to Authority Permeate The Language of Science and Faith

Giberson and Collins appeal to authority but admit the evidence is all that matters, claim that anti-Darwin literature uses “outdated” arguments when their own book uses outdated arguments for evolution, and Giberson lacks the same qualifications of those Darwin-doubting scientists whose qualifications he attacks. Why are they making these weak, non-scientific, and self-contradictory arguments?