Category: Faith & Science
Catholics and Intelligent Design, Part Five
Jay Richards tackles the claim that ID arguments fall within the jurisdiction of natural science, and how that claim relates to common Catholic ways of demarcating science and philosophy.
Karl Giberson Has a Problem With Bill Dembski’s “View of Science”
. . . though you have to wade through a few pages on young-earth creationism, global warming, and the “humiliating” rejection of consensus science by the evangelical community (also noted in his subheading for being “intellectually impoverished).
Does Giberson and Collins’ Neanderthal Argument Demonstrate “Common Ancestry”?
When most people hear “Neanderthal,” they think of a primitive caveman-like prehuman brute. What many don’t realize is that this popular view is very much a Darwinian interpretation, and it is betrayed by much evidence.
Rebutting Karl Giberson and Francis Collins’ Argument for Eye Evolution
Without evidence to back up their argument, it seems that Giberson and Collins simply want us to take their evolutionary claims about the power of mutation on faith.
More Muddle from “Catholic” Scientists
When Pope Benedict denied in his Easter homily that we are an insignificant product of a random evolutionary process, we were bound to get some confused news stories on Catholicism and evolution.