For Darwinists There is No Presenting Both Sides in Intelligent Design Debate
It’s okay for Hector Avalos to teach a class that specifically denounces intelligent design, but it isn’t okay for Tom Ingebritsent to teach a class that presents intelligent design and evolution impartially. This is supposed to be free and open debate? Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.evolutionnews.org.

Nature Magazines’s Choice Blogger Has Heaps of Fun with the Crucifixion
The media endlessly inspect the religious affiliations of Darwin critics, of course, supposedly because a scientist’s religious views can be used to discount his scientific views. But, in contrast, they do not show us the views of the proselytizing atheists who host so many of the Darwinist organizations and websites, leading so much of the the Darwinist campaign against ID. Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.evolutionnews.org.

he New York Times published a letter from the president of Discovery Institute, Bruce Chapman, correcting Laurie Goodstein’s piece “Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker.” In addition to the misinformation Chapman notes, the story also passed along an error concerning the Templeton Foundation.

Nature Magazine Promotes Darwinist who Favors Using Brass Knuckles on ID Proponents
Nature magazine is promoting rabid ID critic PZ Myers as a science blog guru. This is the Myers who wrote about ID proponents on his blog: ” I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It¹s time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots.” Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.evolutionnews.org