The top-down pattern of appearance of animal phyla during the Cambrian explosion represents major conflicting evidence for Darwinian evolution.
In all of his “poor” design arguments, Lents inadvertently embraces the design inference.
Darwinists will respond with the usual mirthless hyena laughter. But this is no joke.
A central progressive theme was historicism, crediting history almost exclusively with the development of culture.
Here are findings about Cambrian and Precambrian strata, and how evolutionists keep dodging the implications of rapid emergence of complex designs.