In all of his “poor” design arguments, Lents inadvertently embraces the design inference.
Darwinists will respond with the usual mirthless hyena laughter. But this is no joke.
Glicksman explains the hugely complex blood flow systems required to keep us clear-headed and alive even while doing everything from gymnastics to simply getting up in the morning.
I explained that his writing has certainly seemed like a subtweet, at the very least, directed at ID. Others appear to understand it similarly.
True, things go wrong with our bodies, with results that range from the tragic to the merely expensive or inconvenient.