The interaction with Lents is of interest because it provides an opportunity to look again, in some detail, at a fascinating illustration of design in action.
Recently, a team of British paleontologists added a new pseudo-explanation.
What’s the pivot that turns us toward more traditional solutions, versus the wrongly named “progressive” ones?
A evolutionist complains, “They try to use ‘Darwinist’ like an albatross linking evolution to Darwin’s Victorian white supremacy.”
As for criticism that ID is a “God of the Gaps” argument, Michael Chaberek urges Thomists to consider where that complaint leads.