Back in 2008, Science published an influential research article claiming evidence for a physiological basis behind differences in political views.
I watched a bit of President Trump’s campaign launch rally in Orlando last night and found it interesting to see him crowd-testing campaign slogans.
How does one “convince” a robot of anything, when changing your mind about an issue implies free will, which materialists are impelled to deny?
Dr. Marks thinks it’s possible that AI may improve in its ability to resolve ambiguous language. Right now it’s not looking so good.
This is fascinating stuff that flies in the face of the viewpoint treasured and defended by prestige academia and the mainstream media.