He compares design in evolution to human creativity, and concedes that his ideas about ID may not be consistent with traditional theism.
The discovery of ETs would not undermine the case for the design of terrestrial life one bit. The situation for Darwinists is very different.
The driving tendencies in nature on the early Earth would have been analogous to seismic tremors rearranging the books in the library.
It’s not just that media-darling disciplines ruled by naturalism fail the facts. They fail at precisely the points where they should succeed if naturalism were true.
I was alarmed to see physicist Sabine Hossenfelder accept as a definition of ”science,” not a method, but merely “what scientists do.”