Bioethicist Travis Rieder compares having a child to releasing a murderer from prison to kill again.
Calling it by a new name doesn’t change the essence of a theory relying on chance.
What does the new book have to offer the perplexed today that previous works don’t?
The point here isn’t to prevent abuse, if it exists. We have animal-welfare laws for that.
Researchers may not call it ID, but what else do you call admiration for natural engineering that inspires attempts to imitate it?