Here’s a fresh twist on efforts to evade a debate about design in nature by associating ID with tendencies in thought that many people find disreputable.
“Imagine two science teachers. Mr. Smith expects students simply to memorize and correctly regurgitate.”
If the future of science is really at risk, then surely not debating evolution is folly.
A few aspects of this catch my attention as pertinent to our concerns here.
This has got to be one of the dopiest, most simple-minded presentations of the subject that I’ve seen.