Writing at the slick science magazine Nautilus, Brian Gallagher demonstrates yet again that there is no accountability when criticizing ID is on the agenda.
On the evolution controversy, Mike Klymkowsky would likely benefit from more study himself.
The reporter’s credibility really dissolves when she turns, inevitably, to the Dover case.
It’s strange to speak of “acceptance” of a scientific theory, as if it were something very different, like a religious doctrine.
I’ve noticed that misrepresentations like these are often accompanied by citations of the Darwin-lobbying group National Center for Science Education.