On the evolution controversy, Mike Klymkowsky would likely benefit from more study himself.
The reporter’s credibility really dissolves when she turns, inevitably, to the Dover case.
It’s strange to speak of “acceptance” of a scientific theory, as if it were something very different, like a religious doctrine.
I’ve noticed that misrepresentations like these are often accompanied by citations of the Darwin-lobbying group National Center for Science Education.
From the headline of the piece you might think you were reading some online tabloid.