In a previous article I described how scientific training can condition some scientists’ minds to resist the evidence in nature for intelligent design.
Don’t miss a fascinating two-day discussion of human origins and the fossil record, human rights and human life, rebranded science and incoherent theology.
In retrospect, where does the evidence stand? Here’s a summary: Venema’s main claims in light of the relevant science.
A final case where biologist Dennis Venema deals with evidence that is irrelevant to the existence of Adam and Eve is his claim about ORFan genes.
Evidence for WGD doesn’t show a Darwinian pathway. There is no evidence here against intelligent design or Michael Behe.