Airbrushing science to suit a fashionable ideological agenda. What do you call that?
When establishment pillars like these finally get fed up and speak out against the weaponizing of science rhetoric, that’s a welcome and very healthy sign.
What gives away the game is the selectivity with which it is deployed against opponents.
The panel pointed to how the “anti-science” label is wielded to shut down challenges to the “consensus” and to advance “anti-human” advocacy.
At Middlebury, hysterical insistence on uniformity of thought drew a furious mob of students.