Two evolutionists publish a paper in a scientific journal comparing car evolution with biological evolution. Are they serious?
This has got to be one of the dopiest, most simple-minded presentations of the subject that I’ve seen.
We talk about the “evolution” of automobiles, yet we know there was design at every stage of this evolution.
Animal forms come and go, but what links them as “acts of mind” (as Agassiz put it) is a “continuity of ideas,” not, says Meyer, the physical continuity that Darwin asserted.
The argument here for intelligent design could not be simpler or clearer.