Extremely improbable events must be macroscopically (simply) describable to be forbidden.
All that is left is to add a factory to the Cornell device so it can produce for itself the molecubes that humans keep building and feeding them.
You don’t have time to give a 30-minute answer outlining the different meanings of the word “evolution” and the evidence pro and con for each.
Science has been so successful explaining other phenomena in terms of purely unintelligent natural forces, why should evolution be so different?
In automobile evolution, for example (or in the evolution of software), as in the history of life, we see major new features appear suddenly.