I’m having trouble making sense of exactly what his model holds. And it seems I’m not alone.
William Lane Craig’s rhetorical strategy is essentially to accept whatever mainstream evolutionary paleoanthropology says.
Perhaps in ten years we’ll be having this conversation again — and perhaps at that time the Smithsonian Institution will give us all a more objective analysis of the evidence.
Proponents of the ruling theory tell us that we are all undoubtedly intelligent enough to fully grasp their theory, as long as we concur with it.
I can hardly resist the temptation to say “I told you so,” or to jokingly remark, “Oops, they did it again.”