The following examination and defense of Dr. Axe serves as a direct, empirical test of Rope Kojonen’s design hypothesis.
Rosenhouse’s book is objectively bad. It purports to be a critique of mathematics as used by ID proponents and of my mathematical work in particular.
Why do so many academic biologists and other scholars resist the design implications of Doug Axe’s research?
Douglas Axe is a protein scientist who has published work on the rarity of new protein folds by doing research on beta-lactamase enzymes.
Ask evolutionists for a clear, unambiguous example of a new gain in function by chance at the genetic level. They will be hard pressed to show one.