Philosophical questions like who we are and where we came from are surely worth considering. But nothing in these documents will bring students closer to being able to do so in an informed manner.
Most studies simply infer or invent some story about the evolution of a gene without any experimental tests.
Darwin’s evolutionary mechanism is just a blunt recipe, an algorithm, and it can only select what is immediately functional.
I explained that his writing has certainly seemed like a subtweet, at the very least, directed at ID. Others appear to understand it similarly.
Dr. Meyer offers here a very crisp and helpful introduction to the codebreaking work of Francis Crick, and more.