Intelligent design’s scientific program can, at least in part, be viewed as an attempt to unmask Darwinist credulity.
If biology isn’t designed, which is another way of saying “engineered,” wouldn’t this state of affairs be pretty counterintuitive?
“The response would be a lot chillier if they tried the same arguments in front of audiences with the relevant expertise.” Is that so?
For a theory whose empirical strength is so great that it cannot be doubted, universal common descent certainly is doubted a lot.
Denial of the humanity of children in the womb from the moment of conception is the most lethal form of science denial.