That Benedict meant to implicate neo-Darwinism in its flight from evidence is not mere wishful thinking on the part of the design community.
Many scientists, receiving vast support from taxpayers, are content with busying themselves in sifting dry technical details.
Intelligent design’s scientific program can, at least in part, be viewed as an attempt to unmask Darwinist credulity.
If biology isn’t designed, which is another way of saying “engineered,” wouldn’t this state of affairs be pretty counterintuitive?
“The response would be a lot chillier if they tried the same arguments in front of audiences with the relevant expertise.” Is that so?