Tag: Cambrian Explosion
John Farrell Tweets His Reply
I don’t have a Twitter account, but if I did, I might answer with a tweet of my own.
In National Review, John Farrell’s Predictable and Misleading Review of Darwin’s Doubt
Instead of addressing, or even accurately representing, Meyer’s main argument for intelligent design, Farrell devotes a significant portion of his review to criticizing the book for the alleged misuse of an ellipsis.
Darwin Defenders Love Donald Prothero’s Ranting Review of Darwin’s Doubt
We thought it was important to repost this excellent response by Casey Luskin, which serves as a decisive rebuttal to Dr. Prothero’s claims.
Does the “Great Unconformity” Explain the Missing Cambrian Ancestors?
An unconformity is an erosional surface representing a gap in the geological record, where time is missing.
Does Natural Selection Leave “Detectable Statistical Evidence in the Genome”?
In Chapter 11 of Darwin’s Doubt, Stephen Meyer responds extensively to critics who have claimed that the evolution of new genes is well understood.