The top-down pattern of appearance of animal phyla during the Cambrian explosion represents major conflicting evidence for Darwinian evolution.
Darwinists will respond with the usual mirthless hyena laughter. But this is no joke.
Here are findings about Cambrian and Precambrian strata, and how evolutionists keep dodging the implications of rapid emergence of complex designs.
Animal forms come and go, but what links them as “acts of mind” (as Agassiz put it) is a “continuity of ideas,” not, says Meyer, the physical continuity that Darwin asserted.
Can we be frank? Cootsona’s treatment of ID is pathetic. As “scholarship,” it’s embarrassing.