What was missing until now is a weighing of the philosophical side of Dr. Meyer’s argument, on which much depends.
Literary critic M. D. Aeschliman sketches the intellectual evolution that connects Barzun with later Darwin critics. The latest is Stephen Meyer.
Daniel Reeves emceed, and in his introductory conversation with Meyer the two discuss a tidbit about Meyer’s time at Cambridge when he was working on his PhD.
Falk claims that Meyer misled his readers by not mentioning an allegedly significant newer result.
Take a look at what Brian Keating, a Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor of Physics at U.C. San Diego, has to say.