One doctor infamously said he didn’t need palliative care when he had euthanasia.
She was called into a meeting and chastised by faculty members. She recorded the meeting and publicized the recording.
This is not only authoritarian — shattering the guarantees of religious liberty in virtually all existing human-rights accords — but could cause a significant brain drain.
Robert Wilson’s work brought him into contact with survivors of Canada’s eugenics regime, eventually drawing him into research and advocacy.
Does the “scientific consensus” mean that only scientists who follow the majority are entitled to have their say?