C. John Collins points out that Venema’s use of “language evolution” is a poor analogy for (his form of) biological evolution.
Dr. Moreland explains what “scientism” means and the conversation proceeds to a recounting of a conversation at a well known medical school with a John Hopkins PhD.
“Oh, Michael Behe happens to be a Catholic, therefore we don’t have listen to him on the science.” Well that’s poppycock.
From otherwise very impassioned and articulate commentators, the silence on this subject is remarkable. Truly, it’s a scandal.
It wasn’t any religious concerns, Prager explains. It was the science.