Tag: Colleagues’ Responses
#1 of Our Top Stories of 2016: Happy New Year! Why the Royal Society Meeting Mattered
The proceedings confirmed something that advocates of intelligent design, including Stephen Meyer and others, have been saying for years.
Royal Society Meeting: What Evolutionists Say When They Think Nobody’s Listening
The event vindicated a major and provocative claim in Stephen Meyer’s book Darwin’s Doubt.
Why the Royal Society Meeting Mattered, in a Nutshell
The proceedings confirmed something that advocates of intelligent design, including Stephen Meyer and others, have been saying for years.
New Precambrian Embryos Are Equivocal at Best
Evolutionists are still desperate to find a long fuse for the Cambrian explosion.
Finagling Molecular Clocks to Fit Darwinism
What good is a measurement device if you can stretch it or squeeze it to fit preconceived ideas?
In Response to Meyer-Dawkins Dispute, Misconceptions About My Research Resurface
In August 2004 I received an email inquiry from plant biologist Art Hunt. He had written a draft for a blog piece reviewing a research article of mine.
As Richard Dawkins Takes on Stephen Meyer, Other Scientists Join the Melee over “Random” Evolution
The ripples from the evening in Toronto are shaping up in all kinds of interesting and unexpected ways.
The Epicurean Escape Hatch — Richard Dawkins Responds to Stephen Meyer
Dawkins has deigned to descend from the atheist Mt. Olympus and immediately stepped in a steaming pile of…organic matter.
Readers Weigh in on Stephen Meyer’s Toronto Debate
After inviting comments for publication, we received many emails of thanks, encouragement, and shrewd analysis.
Larry Moran — Voice of Reason
We weren’t the only ones to notice Krauss’s “shenanigans” during Saturday’s debate with Meyer and Lamoureux.