Tag: Colleagues’ Responses
George Gilder: Darwin’s Doubt Is “Best Science Book Ever Written,” “Will Be Read for Hundreds of Years”
As we approach the publication date of Darwin’s Doubt, I note that today happens to be the 100th anniversary of the premiere of Stravinsky’s revolutionary Rite of Spring.
What Darwin’s Enforcers Will Say About Darwin’s Doubt: A Prediction
I foresee some critics arguing that it’s not fair game to invite the reading public to consider what’s going on in peer-reviewed technical literature pertaining to evolution.
Harvard Museum Exhibit Puts Evolution at Visitors’ Fingertips — But at What Cost to Understanding?
Museums need to be viewed, in part, as recruitment centers for Darwinism.
Cambrian Explosion: It’s Just Physics
Lava produces cavities, and a sponge or Swiss cheese produces cavities, but that doesn’t imply they have any “physico-genetic” relationship.
Darwinizing Metamorphosis with Magic
Pity the party that tries to Darwinize metamorphosis: to give an evolutionary explanation for the transformation from caterpillar to butterfly that resembles death and resurrection. One bold evolutionist has given it a try, but is his explanation an appeal to magic? In the documentary Metamorphosis from Illustra Media, biologist Richard Stringer explains why he was attracted to the study of butterflies. “That’s biology; it’s also magic.” Of course he intended the reference to magic as a metaphor, because he proceeded to investigate metamorphosis scientifically, examining the process in detail with MRI. Frank Ryan, however, writing for New Scientist, is weak on details and big on veritable magic, speaking of how metamorphosis arose or emerged with little more causation than casual Read More ›