Tag: Colleagues’ Responses
George Gilder: Darwin’s Doubt Is “Best Science Book Ever Written,” “Will Be Read for Hundreds of Years”
As we approach the publication date of Darwin’s Doubt, I note that today happens to be the 100th anniversary of the premiere of Stravinsky’s revolutionary Rite of Spring.
What Darwin’s Enforcers Will Say About Darwin’s Doubt: A Prediction
I foresee some critics arguing that it’s not fair game to invite the reading public to consider what’s going on in peer-reviewed technical literature pertaining to evolution.
Harvard Museum Exhibit Puts Evolution at Visitors’ Fingertips — But at What Cost to Understanding?
Museums need to be viewed, in part, as recruitment centers for Darwinism.
Cambrian Explosion: It’s Just Physics
Lava produces cavities, and a sponge or Swiss cheese produces cavities, but that doesn’t imply they have any “physico-genetic” relationship.
Darwinizing Metamorphosis with Magic
Pity the party that tries to Darwinize metamorphosis: to give an evolutionary explanation for the transformation from caterpillar to butterfly that resembles death and resurrection. One bold evolutionist has given it a try, but is his explanation an appeal to magic?