Tag: Colleagues’ Responses
#2 of Our Top Ten Evolution Stories of 2014: Now with More Doubt! Meyer’s Landmark Is Back in a New Edition, Replying to the Critics
It’s a mantra among defenders of orthodox Darwinian theory: There is no debate about evolution.
ABC News Says “‘Darwin’s Dilemma’ May Be Solved”: What, Again?
The common theme among each of these “solutions” to Darwin’s dilemma is that none of them explain the origin of biological information.
Among Theistic Evolutionists, Still No Consensus on What’s Wrong with Stephen Meyer’s Argument
The notion that mutation and selection really aren’t blind and undirected is a faith-statement for which they can provide no supporting evidence.
Low Oxygen Suffocates Darwinian Explanations for the Cambrian Explosion
Well over a year since Darwin’s Doubt was published, Darwinists still can’t seem to find any better explanation for the Cambrian explosion than oxygen levels.
Alister McGrath Mistakes Intelligent Design for a God-of-the-Gaps Argument
I’m a fan of much of McGrath’s writings, but when it comes to ID, there are problems.