Skip to content
  • ES
Evolution News Logo

Evolution News& Science Today

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
      • paleontology-tnPaleontology
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • casey-luskin-2020-tnCasey Luskin
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • Michael-Egnor-Stony-BrookMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • walter-myers-III-150Walter Myers III
      • emily-reeves-smEmily Reeves
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • Günter BechlyGünter Bechly
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • George-Eliot-smElizabeth Whately
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • infodesk
  • Spanish Edition
  • 05.17.22

Tag: common ancestor

Evolution IconEvolution
Jonathan Witt@JonathanRWitt
October 22, 2021, 3:59 PM

Forbidden Question: Common Descent or Common Design?

Think of cars. A Tesla and a Cadillac share many features — but of course, none of that means that Teslas blindly evolved from Cadillacs, or vice versa.

Evolution IconEvolution
Casey Luskin
March 26, 2021, 8:18 AM

What’s Wrong with Calling Intelligent Design “Anti-Evolution”?

The term “anti-evolution” has been used for decades, over and over, by untold numbers of defenders of Darwin and critics of the theory of intelligent design.

Intelligent Design IconIntelligent Design
Evolution News @DiscoveryCSC
March 7, 2021, 2:37 PM

Another “Junk DNA” Icon Bites the Dust

Casey Luskin examines a paper which argues that the famous beta-globin pseudogene is functional. Why is this pseudogene famous?

Life Sciences IconLife Sciences
Jonathan Witt@JonathanRWitt
February 25, 2021, 6:18 AM

Botany Journal Revisits Charles Darwin’s “Abominable Mystery”

A recent paper by Richard Buggs shows that a problem for evolutionary theory has grown more acute since Darwin’s time.

Tom Gilson
March 8, 2019, 5:06 AM

Darwin Devolves: Another Huge Advance Against Darwinism and for Intelligent Design

This book is built on solid science. It’s going to be harder than ever for critics to spit it out just because they don’t like its taste.

Posts navigation

Page1 Page2 Page3 Next

Trending

  • How Science Fueled the White Supremacist Mass Murderer in Buffalo, NY
  • How We Moved Beyond Darwin to the Miracle of Man
  • When Does Human Life Begin?
  • Why Are Science Reporters So Credulous?
  • Human Origins — The Scientific Imagination at Play
  • How Much Can Evolution Really Accomplish?

InfoDesk

  • Molecular Machines
  • Fine-Tuning Parameters
  • Protected: Vestigial Organs or Structures
  • Theistic Evolution
  • Charles Darwin

Recommended

  • More Cambrian Woes for Evolution
  • What Is ID and How Should We Defend It?
  • New Form of Biological Self-Replication?
  • Caltech Finds Amazing Role for Noncoding DNA
  • Ultra-Conserved Elements: Same Old Results

Archives

  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2022 Discovery Institute