It’s another example of a paper that sounds like it could have been written by a proponent of intelligent design.
We have a lonely hypothesis standing by itself in the center of the room, which no one, including its author, will own as true.
“The category ‘mainstream science’ sounds plausibly neutral, capturing the sort of objective knowledge to which any well-educated adult should assent.”
Inaccurate teaching about evolution is widespread, as Jonathan Wells’s review of textbooks shows.
If you tried to build a pipe that had to rotate on its long axis while maintaining its angular shape, could you do better than this?