Of course, an allergy to conceding error is not unique to ID opponents, but it is typical of them.
A recent biology paper inches up to the edge of design advocacy, without using the phrase “intelligent design.”
Software engineers are trained in design principles, and also have real experience of how complex functional systems appear and change constructively.
This is one key issue on which proponents of ID and of theistic evolution differ.
Ewert proposes that life is best explained not by Darwin’s hypothesis of an ancestry tree, but by a modern design-inspired hypothesis.