Coming from the National Center for Science Education or the New York Times, this is typical.
Here’s a fresh twist on efforts to evade a debate about design in nature by associating ID with tendencies in thought that many people find disreputable.
A much better approach would be no religion in biology class, and more science.
“Imagine two science teachers. Mr. Smith expects students simply to memorize and correctly regurgitate.”
Wallace’s formulation of evolution was quite incompatible with Darwin’s. His theory might be called intelligent evolution.