Shermer’s term “Intelligent Design creationism” signals his own misjudgment in the matter, namely, that ID is creationism.
The reason scientists do not take seriously the claims of Intelligent Design theorists today is the same reason that scientists did not take seriously Wallace’s speculations about an “overarching intelligence.”
Reporters should be reticent to fix the legally significant label “creationist” to nascent science education bills.
John Lennox on Hawking and “Do the Laws of Physics Make God Unnecessary?”
If you think Darwin’s theory of evolution is as secure as Einstein’s theory of special relativity, well…maybe you’re right.