One of the tragic trends in thinking about evolution has been to blur the distinction between humans and animals. History warns us not to regard this lightly.
An advocate for Darwinian medicine wants to bring two historical opponents in the design debate, Pasteur and Darwin, into a peace treaty for the good of public health.
Yesterday, Sarah Chaffee pointed out a remarkable article in the top science journal Nature, “Stop the science training that demands ‘don’t ask’.”
For those who wish to caricature the theory of intelligent design, Wallace becomes a very inconvenient historical figure.
Does the “scientific consensus” mean that only scientists who follow the majority are entitled to have their say?