Given evolution’s racist baggage, you might think the theory’s proponents would be somewhat abashed to accuse the critics of Darwin of “white supremacy.”
That evolution, over a span of 11 million years or so, was once hailed as a “poster child” for the confirmation of Darwinian theory.
Explosions of new life forms followed by stasis are emphatically not what evolution expects to find, but it is what paleontologists do find.
The fossil record is not a good match with Darwinian thinking, but it makes a strong pairing with intelligent design.
How just is the imputation of “neo-creationist” tendencies to members of the intelligent design community?