As a fellow mathematician, I would have liked to see from Rosenhouse a vigorous and insightful discussion of my ideas.
These recurrent forms extend from original “primal patterns,” much as argued by such 19th-century opponents of Darwinism as Richard Owen and Louis Agassiz.
It is a pity that Darwin’s homeland no longer boasts a satirist of the caliber of Thomas Love Peacock to exploit this rich seam of comic absurdity.
The argument for ID could not be clearer: Unintelligent forces cannot rearrange atoms into computers and airplanes and nuclear power plants and smartphones.
Weinberg’s evidence that Discovery Institute uses intelligent design to bash communism is completely lacking.